June 2010
Summer is a great time to work on course and program improvements. We seem to finally have the time to tinker with things that we just can’t find time for during the crush of the academic year. This issue offers a couple of experiential exercises, an alternative to business plans, and an enhancement for the traditional speaker series.
We welcome innovations and ideas in entrepreneurship education from your programs that you would like to share with your colleagues around the globe. Just send them along to me at jeff.cornwall@belmont.edu
We have all heard the growing chorus of faculty debating the proper role, if any, for teaching business plans. A valid criticism coming out of this debate is that the way business plans have been traditionally taught results in well-written “works of fiction.” Students are told to come up with an idea, do extensive research, and write a comprehensive business plan.
A way that can improve the validity of the business plans is to recognize that the traditional approach misses a critical step in the business planning process. We are learning from our study of successful entrepreneurs that most engage in a step between assessing the opportunity and writing the business plan where they test and develop the business model.
A business model adds more detail to the evaluation and begins to make sure all of the moving parts of the business work together. It tests the internal logic of the business. But it does all of this without moving directly into the rigor and detail of the formal business plan.
The challenge in teaching about business modeling is that it has tended to be understood as a rather vague and intuitive process.
However, there is now a business modeling tool that works for both practitioners and for those of us who teach entrepreneurship. It was developed by lead authors Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur. They integrated the best practices of 470 practitioners from 45 countries to develop a tool to improve the process of developing business models. More information can be found at their website:
www.businessmodelgeneration.com. This Web site contains a large amount of free information on business modeling.
We will be offering classroom exercises and assignments that build off of this approach to business modeling in coming issues of this newsletter.
Students Role-Playing as Investors I was in a meeting the other day with Germain Boer, Director of the
Owen Entrepreneurship Center at Vanderbilt University, and a group of Nashville entrepreneurs. Several of the entrepreneurs in the meeting said that before they started their ventures, they had taken their ideas into Boer’s MBA entrepreneurship class and pitched it to his students as a living case study. There was agreement among the entrepreneurs that the students had asked some of the toughest questions and offered the best feedback they had gotten from anyone during the early stages of bringing their ventures toward actual launch.
Boer’s students act as investors hearing the entrepreneur’s idea being presented. They are told to ask probing questions, looking for possible flaws in the business model.
Then when it comes time for students to make their own “pitch” in class, they have had the opportunity to learn from observing and evaluating actual entrepreneurs making their pitches.
It is common to have living case studies of operating entrepreneurial ventures in our classes. Using aspiring entrepreneurs offers a twist that puts the students on the other side of the table for the initial pitch of a new business idea.
Speed Dating Networking Exercise
Levin believes that one component of successful entrepreneurship is simply using resources garnered through networking. The key is to avoid the common tendency to want to control conversations with others. Instead, his exercise helps to force the students to be open and really listen to what the other is communicating in terms of interests, connections, passions, ideas, etc.
The exercise itself is very simple. Place pairs of chairs facing each other, positioned 4 feet apart in a line (one half the chairs facing one way, the other half facing them, front against front). One half of the students, the “stayers,” sit in one row of chairs, facing the now empty chairs. The other half of the students, who are the “movers” in this exercise, then seat in the empty chairs.
Each pair of students has one minute to talk. They must share information about their passions, hopes, dreams, favorite places, hometowns, and so forth. But since they only have one minute and each student must share information with the other, they should be very aware not to hog the speaking time. After the one minute each of the “movers” moves on to the next chair. The “stayers” stay put. Continue the process until each “mover” has spoken with every “stayer.”
Then move the chairs back for general class discussion of the exercise. Lead the discussion by using creative categories to place classmates within, such as:
- Who is destined to be a millionaire by the time they are 25?
- Who is going to become a Zen priest?
- Who is likely to appear on Broadway?
- Who is likely to win the Nobel Prize?
- Who is likely to win a Pulitzer?
Once students are identified for each category by their classmates, drill down further and ask, “Why? What did you learn about the student to make this judgment, to give you this opinion?”
Levin finds this to be a good exercise for early in the semester. In addition to sharpening the students’ networking skills, the exercise also sets a tone in the class for keener observation, better listening, and most importantly, improved self-awareness.